Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a global score of 83, which is slightly better than Galaxy Alpha's 76.3 overall score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has the previous 10 version while Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a noticeably thicker and heavier cellphone than the Galaxy Alpha.
Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a way smaller display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's processor is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Alpha's processor, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.