Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 5430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1800 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is way better than Galaxy Alpha's score of 74.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is incredibly heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy Alpha.
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G feature really similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a better pixels amount per inch of display, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a lot bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior processor than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.