Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-07-09 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| $ 130.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.04 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a general score of 74.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3's overall score of 68.7. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has an older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is better than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, it must be noted that it is also a way older, heavier and a little thicker phone.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot better display than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a lot higher count of pixels per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a much better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a 3760mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a little more expensive than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.