Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-09 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.04 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, having a global score of 79.5 against 68.7. Galaxy S7's design weights the same than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, but it is thinner. Galaxy S7 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2560px resolution, a lot better count of pixels per display inch and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy S7 has a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 200 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, and although they both have 4 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better camera than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much better (4K) video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S7 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.