Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy C5's 76.4 overall score. The iPhone XR construction is much newer than the Galaxy C5's, but it is noticeably heavier and much thicker. Apple iPhone XR counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a little lower display pixel density and a little bit worse 828 x 1792 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy C5 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The iPhone XR has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XR counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a bigger aperture for better low light captures. The iPhone XR has a little better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.