Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Galaxy C5, having a score of 84.2 against 76.4. Apple iPhone XS's design is a lot newer, but heavier and thicker than the Galaxy C5. The iPhone XS counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy C5, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a more vivid screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution, a little bigger display and a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy C5 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 128 GB.
The Apple iPhone XS features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has 2659mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone XS captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.