Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy C5, having an 81.3 score against 76.4. The LG V35 ThinQ body is noticeably newer, but just a little heavier and thicker than the Galaxy C5. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a bigger screen and a higher display pixels density.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite better processing power than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy C5, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.