Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is better than Galaxy C5, getting a score of 89.6 against 76.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has older 10 version while Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though Motorola edge is much newer than Galaxy C5, it is a lot thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Motorola edge counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola edge features a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy C5, because although the Motorola edge has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen.
Motorola edge has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy C5, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola edge counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 73% bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola edge captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.