Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, getting a general score of 87 against 76.4. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is much newer than Samsung Galaxy C5, it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy C5 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
Motorola razr (2020) captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations. Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better battery life than Galaxy C5, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.