Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Galaxy C5, with an 83.8 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Galaxy C5. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C5, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Galaxy A50 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy C5. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.