Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, with an 85.5 score against 76.4. Galaxy A51 is a much newer phone than Samsung Galaxy C5, but it is heavier and thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C5. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.