Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C5's general score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy C5's, although it's thicker and heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C5, because it has a lot larger display, a just a bit better count of pixels in each screen inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a much better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.