Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than Galaxy C5, having a 79.3 score against 76.4. Galaxy Note 5 is a better cellphone than Galaxy C5, it must be told that it's also older, somewhat thicker and heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy C5 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has 7 more cores (although slower). The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper display than Galaxy C5, because it has a better 2560 x 1440px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a quite better pixel density.
Galaxy Note 5 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy C5 features a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy C5 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.