Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C5's 76.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy C5's, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C5, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a much bigger aperture. Galaxy Note10 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.