Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Galaxy C5, with a 95.4 score against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is noticeably newer, but a lot heavier and way thicker than Galaxy C5. These devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a really bigger display and a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 92 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.