Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-01 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C5's 76.4 general score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is extremely thinner and much lighter than Samsung Galaxy C5.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking display than Galaxy C5, because it has a way larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a just a little better display pixel density. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy C5 counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery life than Galaxy C5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.