Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C5's global score of 76.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, Xperia Z4v is an older, heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C5.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has more pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Samsung Galaxy C5 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Xperia Z4v has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy C5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Xperia Z4v captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.