Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C5's overall score of 76.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is notably newer, but incredibly heavier and much thicker than the Galaxy C5. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a display that is very similar to Galaxy C5's display, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.