Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having a global score of 82 against 78.4. IPhone XR is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone XR counts with a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XR counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a little worse pixel count per inch of screen and a bit worse 828 x 1792 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C7 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The iPhone XR takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.