Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's overall score of 78.4. The iPhone XS is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, although it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. The iPhone XS has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. The iPhone XS counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy C7 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy C7 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy C7 Pro features greater battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 24 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.