Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's overall score of 78.4. The Google Pixel 3 construction is newer and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's, but it is just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C7 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy C7 Pro features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh. The Google Pixel 3 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.