Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having an 87.5 score against 78.4. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is much newer and a bit lighter than the Galaxy C7 Pro's, although it is also somewhat thicker.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bigger screen and a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better processing power than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.