Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 global score. Google Pixel 5's body is newer and somewhat lighter than Galaxy C7 Pro's, but it's also just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a quite greater display density. The Google Pixel 5 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a little bit better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 5 features superior battery performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 24% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.