Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 386 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 Pro is a little bit better than the HTC One M9, getting a 78.4 score against 77.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy C7 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Galaxy C7 Pro's design is newer and extremely thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is also just a bit heavier.
HTC One M9 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. HTC One M9 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a camera with a higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.