Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has an overall score of 78.4, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro is older and just a bit heavier than the LG G7 Fit, it's body is still just a bit thinner. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has an older 6.0 Marshmallow version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro also has 4 more processing cores. LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a bit bigger screen.
LG G7 Fit has a better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have a same resolution camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features just a little better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.