Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy C7 Pro, having an 81 score against 78.4. Although LG G7 ThinQ is a little thicker than the Galaxy C7 Pro, it's just a bit lighter and newer. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version, providing a couple additional features.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G7 ThinQ has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy C7 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG G7 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.