Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy C7 Pro, getting a overall score of 82.7 against 78.4. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy C7 Pro. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit larger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG G8X ThinQ features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.