Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 78.4. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and just a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, although it's just a little bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a higher pixel quantity in each screen inch, a quite bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a 16 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a battery lifetime that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.