Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 overall score. LG Velvet's design is notably newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. LG Velvet features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
The LG Velvet has a little sharper display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a larger display and a quite greater pixel density. LG Velvet takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher video resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features better battery performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 30% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.