Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, with a global score of 87.1 against 78.4. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer phone than Galaxy C7 Pro, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit better pixels quantity per display inch. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy C7 Pro has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 36% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a lot better (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.