Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-04-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 score. Motorola One Zoom's construction is a lot newer, but just a little bit heavier and thicker than the Galaxy C7 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Zoom. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro and the Motorola One Zoom both count with really similar screens, although the Motorola One Zoom also has a bit larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit better pixels number in each inch in the display. Motorola One Zoom counts with more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola One Zoom takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a camera with much more megapixels and a much better (4K) video quality. The Motorola One Zoom features improved battery life than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.