Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy C7 Pro, with a overall score of 87 against 78.4. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is much newer than Galaxy C7 Pro's, but it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a just a little better screen pixels density.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a greater camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot more MP camera in the back and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.