Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, getting a score of 79.2 against 78.4. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner, but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. These devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the previous 15 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy C7 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.