Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has an overall score of 78.4, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro is an notably older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but Samsung could make it thinner and noticeably lighter anyway.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy C7 Pro features a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.