Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C7 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A70, getting a 78.4 score against 76.9. Despite of the fact that Galaxy C7 Pro is notably older than Galaxy A70, it's body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C7 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing some extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy A70 features a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy C7 Pro, although the Galaxy A70 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bigger display and a bit greater pixel quantity in each screen inch. The Galaxy A70 counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Galaxy C7 Pro one, and although the Galaxy A70 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy C7 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates. Galaxy A70 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A70 has superior battery life than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.