Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having a general score of 88.5 against 78.4. Galaxy Z Flip's design has the same thickness than Galaxy C7 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger display, a little higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy C7 Pro and Galaxy Z Flip count with incredibly similar batteries duration. The Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.