Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having a 92.3 score against 78.4. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, but it's a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster processor than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a larger display and a little bit higher pixels density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much higher video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.