Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's global score of 78.4. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro count with similar screens, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger display, a just a bit better display pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.