Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-07 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having a general score of 79 against 78.4. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a way newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, although it's heavier and thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy C7 Pro one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger screen, a little bit better pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a much better video resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.