Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 77.7. The Google Pixel 4 body is noticeably newer and a bit lighter, but somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy C7. Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280.
Galaxy C7 features much more memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C7 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a much lower 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way better video resolution. The Galaxy C7 has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.