Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy C7's 77.7 general score. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy C7. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better looking screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a higher pixel number in each inch of screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a little bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy C7 has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 128 GB.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy C7, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.