Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. The Galaxy C7 is a incredibly older and a little heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, but Samsung could make it thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C7 has 8.0 Oreo version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a better display density, a little bit larger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG G7 Fit has a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C7 has just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy C7 also has 4 more CPU cores. The LG G7 Fit captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy C7 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.