Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7, with a global score of 78.6 against 77.7. Although it's the best in this review, it must be told that it is also somewhat heavier and notably thicker. These phones include Android OS, but LG V10 has an older 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy C7 counts with a little better processing power than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy C7 also has a greater number of faster cores. LG V10 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V10 also has a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels density.
LG V10 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a 16 MP resolution camera in the back, the LG V10 also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture. The LG V10 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy C7 has just a little better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.