Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy C7, having an 81.3 score against 77.7. The LG V35 ThinQ design is incredibly newer and just a little lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than Galaxy C7. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy C7, because it has a bit larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixels density.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy C7 both count with similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.