Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C7's 77.7 score. The LG V40 ThinQ construction has the same weight than the Samsung Galaxy C7, but it's just a bit thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a greater pixels density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bit larger screen.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger camera aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy C7 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.