| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-06-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy C7 is slightly better than the Moto Z Force, having a 77.7 score against 75.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C7 has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although the Galaxy C7 and Moto Z Force were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy C7 design is a little heavier but a little thinner.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy C7 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy C7 also has a higher number of cores.
The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a lot better video definition. The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C7, because it has a 6% greater battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.