Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7, having a 79.2 score against 77.7. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is incredibly newer and notably thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy C7. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy C7 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy C7 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better camera than Galaxy C7, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments, a back camera with much more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.