Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C7 is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having a 77.7 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy C7 body is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Nokia 9 PureView, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a better number of pixels per screen inch, a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bit larger display.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Nokia 9 PureView has a little better processing power than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a lot lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos. Nokia 9 PureView has a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy C7 one, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.