Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a overall score of 77.7 against 76.2. Samsung Galaxy C7's design is way lighter and extremely thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released 4 years before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C7 has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features and increased performance.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger display. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little faster CPU than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C7, because it has a larger aperture for better low-light images, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a much higher video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features longer battery duration than Galaxy C7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.