Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than Galaxy C7, with a 79.3 score against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 design is older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy C7. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Galaxy C7 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy C7 also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
The Galaxy Note 5 features a bit better camera than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a 16 mega pixels resolution camera and the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Samsung Galaxy C7 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C7 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
Galaxy C7 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.